Although ALL my time is taken up with my business Enpresiv, I do like to have a couple of side projects going to keep my development skills up (I’m doing less development with Enpresiv these days), and so I can try out some ideas and experiment a little.
I’ve just launched a small side project, and decided I’d give goplan.org a shot to help manage the development. I’ve used Basecamp before (the leading web application in this space) on a number of personal projects, and I’ve really enjoyed the experience.
I’ve only just started to use goplan.org so these are my first impressions, I’m sure I’ll have different things to say as I keep using it. However, I’ll start on a positive note with the design. I really like the design of goplan.org, it is clean, clutter less and is very simple to use; in fact, in points it’s too simple and a little more information at times would be handy.
I think the feature set is one of it’s strongest selling points. The feature that goplan.org does better than Basecamp is bug management or tickets. Basecamp doesn’t have a direct function dedicated to bug management or tickets, and because I’m a web developer, bug/ticket handling is a really nice feature to have.
The only bad thing about goplan.org is, it’s speed! I signed up yesterday and started my first project, and I must say, it was really slow. I was even questioning continuing my trial. However, when using working with goplan.org today, it was much faster. In fact, speed was not even an issue. I’m not sure what was going on yesterday, but I hope the speed continues!
technorati tags:goplan, web2.0
Filed under: web 2.0